<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iChat AV Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sherman.ca/archives/2005/04/04/ichat-av-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sherman.ca/archives/2005/04/04/ichat-av-updates/</link>
	<description>Mostly random thoughts on software, gear and the great outdoors.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:17:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jw</title>
		<link>http://www.sherman.ca/archives/2005/04/04/ichat-av-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>jw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 10:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherman.ca/2005/04/04/ichat-av-updates/#comment-267</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;yup, i too would like to see ichat with a link to PSTN only sometimes i find it difficult to vizualize just how it would fit into apple&#039;s plan.  apple needs to be able to cash in on the idea - at the moment ichat earns apple next to nothing (beyond more halo effect), just as skype (without pstn related extras) brought in no boats. following the skype route might work - as a .mac user i would be quite happy to pay for a version of ichat that let me onto the pstn, though i would not pay annual fees. however the real opportunity i see is in the integration of ichat &#038; airport. apple should make the much rumoured itunes phone able to make wifi based voip calls over an airport network, and give ichat a similar voip/pstn ability. this route gives apple the opportunity to make and sell HARDWARE, which historically been the mainstay of apple&#039;s revenue. there may however be some dilemmas as other are already someway down the path such as http://www.optimobile.se/solution.html and would it be sensible to try to tie people in to airport? rather than make the technology work on any wifi network....  itunes/airtunes/airport express seems to get away with this so maybe we will see an apple branded gsm/wifi handset working  with ichat/aircall/airport exchange or something.  food for thought&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup, i too would like to see ichat with a link to PSTN only sometimes i find it difficult to vizualize just how it would fit into apple&#8217;s plan.  apple needs to be able to cash in on the idea &#8211; at the moment ichat earns apple next to nothing (beyond more halo effect), just as skype (without pstn related extras) brought in no boats. following the skype route might work &#8211; as a .mac user i would be quite happy to pay for a version of ichat that let me onto the pstn, though i would not pay annual fees. however the real opportunity i see is in the integration of ichat &#38;#38; airport. apple should make the much rumoured itunes phone able to make wifi based voip calls over an airport network, and give ichat a similar voip/pstn ability. this route gives apple the opportunity to make and sell HARDWARE, which historically been the mainstay of apple&#8217;s revenue. there may however be some dilemmas as other are already someway down the path such as <a href="http://www.optimobile.se/solution.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.optimobile.se/solution.html</a> and would it be sensible to try to tie people in to airport? rather than make the technology work on any wifi network&#8230;.  itunes/airtunes/airport express seems to get away with this so maybe we will see an apple branded gsm/wifi handset working  with ichat/aircall/airport exchange or something.  food for thought</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
